Skip to content
JD Sherrod

#13JD Sherrod

JD Sherrod is a Volume Passer for Kent State.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So JD Sherrod's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
2/7 Comp/Att18 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT28.6% Comp %
Rushing
67 Rush yards0 Rush TD13 Carries5.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume64
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch50
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.43 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Tennessee (SP+ 22).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4300.43Wk 3 vs Tennessee: +0.43 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Penn State: -0.43 EPA/play4
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
3@TennesseeL0-7122.00/100090.25600.43
4@Penn StateL0-5624.62/6180019.8110-0.43

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.5%
Passing plays
28.6%
Rushing plays
20.0%
Standard downs
21.8%
Passing downs
23.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.45
Passing downs
-0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.43 / -0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.