Skip to content
Jaxon Smolik

#14Jaxon Smolik

Jaxon Smolik is a Dual-Threat QB for Temple. Jaxon's 2026 season produced 4.5 total EPA across 32 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jaxon Smolik's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
14/22 Comp/Att116 Pass yards1 Pass TD1 INT63.6% Comp %
Rushing
69 Rush yards0 Rush TD11 Carries6.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume78
  • Dual-Threat96
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.1300.13Wk 1 vs Rhode Island: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Penn State: +0.13 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRhode IslandW38-144/65710-200.10
2vsPenn StateL9-2719.810/1659017100.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.3%
Passing plays
58.5%
Rushing plays
12.0%
Standard downs
21.2%
Passing downs
41.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.05 / 0.38

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.