Skip to content
Javen Jacobs

#8Javen Jacobs

Javen Jacobs is a Pass-Catching Back for Utah State. Javen's 2025 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 106 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Javen Jacobs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
429 Rush yards5 Rush TD65 Carries6.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
43 Receptions379 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.8 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns219 KR yards0 KR TD8 Punt returns31 PR yards0 PR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

7
Targets
7.0y
Avg depth
3.2y
After catch
57%
Catch rate

The ball travels 7.0 yards in the air on an average target 2.0 yards shorter than the median. Another 3.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
0
0
short
2
50% · 6y
0
4
75% · 21y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume38
  • Explosiveness72
  • Consistency30
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency30th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.29 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.05 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Boise State (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0501.05Wk 1 vs UTEP: -0.29 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas A&M: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Air Force: +0.48 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs McNeese: -0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Vanderbilt: +0.60 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Hawai'i: +0.28 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs San José State: -0.03 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs New Mexico: +0.06 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Nevada: +0.13 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UNLV: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Fresno State: +0.25 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Boise State: +1.05 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUTEPW28-16-17.54123.00100-0.29
2@Texas A&ML22-4420.78324.003190-0.09
3vsAir ForceW49-30-3.29717.9133600.48
4vsMcNeeseW48-77223.113100-0.62
5@VanderbiltL35-5520.346315.8064810.60
7@Hawai'iL26-441.7200.0023410.28
8vsSan José StateW30-25-14.37111.603410-0.03
9@New MexicoL14-330.96315.2031300.06
11vsNevadaW51-14-13.4111.0076300.13
12@UNLVL26-294.3122.0011200.27
13@Fresno StateW28-171.88688.522400.25
14vsBoise StateL24-253.159218.4145301.05
20vsWashington StateL21-343.83248.005461

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.2%
Passing plays
11.5%
Rushing plays
15.6%
Standard downs
14.3%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.27
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.