Skip to content
Jared Curtis

#2Jared Curtis

Jared Curtis is a Dual-Threat QB for Vanderbilt.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jared Curtis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
7/9 Comp/Att60 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT77.8% Comp %
Rushing
22 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries7.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume87
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch34
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Delaware (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5000.50Wk 1 vs Austin Peay: +0.42 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Delaware: +0.50 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsAustin PeayW28-97/960002200.42
2vsDelawareW35-26-7.614/2221010120.50

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
30.6%
Passing plays
56.9%
Rushing plays
11.0%
Standard downs
24.7%
Passing downs
45.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.43
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.91

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.