Skip to content
Jamarien Wheeler
Jamarien Wheeler

#7Jamarien Wheeler

WR·Eastern Michigan·2025

Jamarien Wheeler is a Versatile WR for Eastern Michigan. Jamarien's 2025 season produced 19.7 total EPA across 31 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jamarien Wheeler's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
23 Receptions301 Rec yards2 Rec TD13.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness41
  • Consistency71
  • Pass-Down23
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Peak game: 1.34 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.340−1.34Wk 1 vs Texas State: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Long Island University: +1.21 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kentucky: +0.08 EPA/play3Wk 7 vs Northern Illinois: +0.48 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Miami (OH): -0.23 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs Bowling Green: +0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ball State: +1.34 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Western Michigan: +0.84 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Texas StateL27-522.311212.00120.41
2vsLong Island UniversityL23-28—155.0151.21
3@KentuckyL23-481.84328.00100.08
7vsNorthern IllinoisW16-10-16.722512.50140.48
8@Miami (OH)L30-44-3.4133.003-0.23
11vsBowling GreenW27-21-12.622110.50160.19
12@Ball StateW24-9-23.0613121.81431.34
14vsWestern MichiganL21-31-1.467212.00280.84

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.8%
Passing plays
10.6%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
5.5%
Passing downs
6.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.70
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.66 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.