Skip to content
Jahmal Edrine

#7Jahmal Edrine

Jahmal Edrine is a Slot Specialist WR for Virginia. Jahmal's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 64 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jahmal Edrine's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
46 Receptions564 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness35
  • Consistency57
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.57 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.61 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6102.61Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +2.61 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs NC State: +0.65 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs William & Mary: +0.17 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.67 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida State: +0.69 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Louisville: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Washington State: +0.98 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Carolina: +1.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs California: -0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Wake Forest: -1.31 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Duke: +1.24 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Virginia Tech: +0.86 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Duke: +0.42 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsCoastal CarolinaW48-7-15.13248.01132.61
2@NC StateL31-354.866811.30170.65
3vsWilliam & MaryW55-1623115.50180.17
4vsStanfordW48-20-11.834615.30250.67
5vsFlorida StateW46-387.25459.00140.69
6@LouisvilleW30-2712.42199.50130.32
8vsWashington StateW22-203.8510220.40370.98
9@North CarolinaW17-16-6.667512.50281.03
10@CaliforniaW31-21-3.22157.509-0.41
11vsWake ForestL9-165.7166.006-1.31
12@DukeW34-176.623417.00211.24
14vsVirginia TechW27-7-10.12199.50100.86
15vsDukeL20-276.634214.00170.42
20vsMissouriW13-714.44389.5012

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.2%
Passing plays
13.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.1%
Passing downs
8.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.81
Pass / Rush EPA
0.57 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.