Skip to content
Jadyn Glasser

#5Jadyn Glasser

Jadyn Glasser is a Dual-Threat QB for Central Michigan.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jadyn Glasser's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
7/9 Comp/Att78 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT77.8% Comp %
Rushing
7 Rush yards1 Rush TD10 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency88
  • Volume43
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (88th percentile).
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh (SP+ 8).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5000.50Wk 1 vs San José State: +0.26 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Pittsburgh: +0.50 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@San José StateW16-14-14.3700.26
2@PittsburghL17-458.47/9780080.4010.50

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.2%
Passing plays
27.3%
Rushing plays
9.1%
Standard downs
16.0%
Passing downs
13.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.94
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.56

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Jadyn Glasser Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Central Michigan · Gridpex