#3Jacolby George

WR·Miami·2024

Jacolby George is a Versatile WR for Miami. Jacolby's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jacolby George's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving

53 Receptions752 Rec yards8 Rec TD14.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

Efficiency100
Volume19
Explosiveness48
Consistency87
Pass-Down100

Player type

Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸12 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.93 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Ball State (SP+ -20).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	@Florida	W41-17	13.8	2	25	12.5	1	23	1.62
2	vsFlorida A&M	W56-9	—	3	28	9.3	0	18	0.41
3	vsBall State	W62-0	-19.8	6	109	18.2	1	25	1.93
4	@South Florida	W50-15	-2.3	1	10	10.0	0	10	0.73
5	vsVirginia Tech	W38-34	10.0	4	59	14.8	1	18	0.53
6	@California	W39-38	4.0	5	59	11.8	0	26	1.23
8	@Louisville	W52-45	13.6	3	43	14.3	1	27	1.12
9	vsFlorida State	W36-14	-3.2	3	21	7.0	0	8	0.71
10	vsDuke	W53-31	5.6	4	74	18.5	1	49	0.55
11	@Georgia Tech	L23-28	1.9	7	88	12.6	0	23	1.20
13	vsWake Forest	W42-14	-5.7	7	91	13.0	2	34	1.31
14	@Syracuse	L38-42	5.5	6	121	20.2	0	40	1.16
20	vsIowa State	L41-42	10.3	2	24	12.0	1	20	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

6.8%

Passing plays

12.0%

Rushing plays

0.5%

Standard downs

6.8%

Passing downs

6.9%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.66
Passing downs: 1.88
Pass / Rush EPA: 1.06 / -0.86

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).