Skip to content
Hunter Hopperton
Hunter Hopperton

#18Hunter Hopperton

Hunter Hopperton is a Pass-Catching Back for Kent State.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hunter Hopperton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
5 Receptions38 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs FB peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume7
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency57
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Game-to-game consistency57th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Ball State (SP+ -23).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs Merrimack: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Buffalo: +0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida State: -0.33 EPA/play4Wk 11 vs Ball State: +0.56 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsMerrimackW21-1711100.36
3vsBuffaloL28-31-7.521100.35
4@Florida StateL10-667.2120-0.33
11@Ball StateL13-17-23.011400.56

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.3%
Passing plays
4.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
2.3%
Passing downs
2.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.11
Passing downs
0.49
Pass / Rush EPA
0.15 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.