Skip to content
Hudson Clement

#13Hudson Clement

Hudson Clement is a Versatile WR for Illinois. Hudson's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 55 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hudson Clement's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
36 Receptions454 Rec yards3 Rec TD12.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume21
  • Explosiveness37
  • Consistency68
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.43 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.75 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Maryland (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7501.75Wk 1 vs Western Illinois: -0.16 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.25 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Western Michigan: +1.06 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: +0.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs USC: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Purdue: +1.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio State: +0.19 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Washington: -0.05 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rutgers: +1.13 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Maryland: +1.75 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wisconsin: +0.38 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Northwestern: +0.89 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsWestern IllinoisW52-3155.005-0.16
2@DukeW45-196.623919.50270.25
3vsWestern MichiganW38-0-1.423115.50221.06
4@IndianaL10-6332.44276.80120.11
5vsUSCW34-3216.92199.5011-0.07
6@PurdueW43-27-6.12157.50141.15
7vsOhio StateL16-3430.16477.80170.19
9@WashingtonL25-4218.42147.0012-0.05
10vsRutgersW35-131.058416.81231.13
12vsMarylandW24-60.637224.02271.75
13@WisconsinL10-27-4.422311.50150.38
14vsNorthwesternW20-135.823015.00210.89
20vsTennesseeW30-2815.034816.0024

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.2%
Passing plays
15.1%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.4%
Passing downs
6.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
1.15
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.