#3Gaston Moore

QB·South Florida·2025

Gaston Moore is a Clutch Passer for South Florida. Gaston's 2025 season produced 7.3 total EPA across 37 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.46
Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.51
Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gaston Moore's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing

34/48 Comp/Att290 Pass yards2 Pass TD2 INT70.8% Comp %

Rushing

-9 Rush yards0 Rush TD15 Carries-0.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

Efficiency0
Volume36
Dual-Threat0
Consistency7
Clutch93

Player type

Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency7th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.40 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Charlotte (SP+ -27).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	C/ATT	Pass Yds	Pass TD	INT	QBR	Rush Yds	Rush TD	EPA/play
3	@Miami	L12-49	20.7	4/5	18	0	0	73.0	—	—	-0.10
4	vsSouth Carolina State	W63-14	—	4/6	16	0	0	33.2	8	0	0.09
6	vsCharlotte	W54-26	-26.7	1/1	13	0	0	100.0	—	—	1.17
8	vsFlorida Atlantic	W48-13	-8.7	1/1	7	0	0	4.6	1	0	-0.10
11	vsUTSA	W55-23	3.7	2/3	-6	0	0	0.0	-14	0	-0.53
14	vsRice	W52-3	-14.8	2/4	6	1	0	87.4	17	0	0.51
20	vsOld Dominion	L10-24	5.9	20/28	236	1	2	49.5	-21	0	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

12.5%

Passing plays

23.3%

Rushing plays

4.3%

Standard downs

11.2%

Passing downs

15.5%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.08
Passing downs: 0.34
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.35 / -0.79

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).