Skip to content
Evan Pryor

#21Evan Pryor

Evan Pryor is a Committee Back for Cincinnati. Evan's 2025 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 92 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Evan Pryor's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
522 Rush yards3 Rush TD76 Carries6.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions107 Rec yards1 Rec TD10.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume45
  • Explosiveness78
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving69
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.28 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Kansas (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Nebraska: +0.05 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Bowling Green: -0.22 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +0.15 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.66 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.50 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.34 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Baylor: +0.12 EPA/play9Wk 13 vs BYU: +0.14 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs TCU: -0.70 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNebraskaL17-206.25295.801500.05
2vsBowling GreenW34-20-12.66335.50-0.22
3vsNorthwestern StateW70-06386.300.15
5@KansasW37-344.169015.001500.66
6vsIowa StateW38-309.91011111.120.50
7vsUCFW20-11-1.211484.40-0.16
8@Oklahoma StateW49-17-15.19637.0022100.34
9vsBaylorW41-201.413665.111100.12
13vsBYUL14-2615.97365.1034800.14
14@TCUL23-458.3382.702271-0.70

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.6%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
25.3%
Standard downs
17.4%
Passing downs
10.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.21
Passing downs
-0.18
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.20 / 0.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.