Skip to content
Eric Singleton Jr.
Eric Singleton Jr.

#2Eric Singleton Jr.

Eric Singleton Jr. is a Versatile WR for Georgia Tech. Eric's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 81 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Eric Singleton Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
131 Rush yards1 Rush TD21 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
56 Receptions754 Rec yards3 Rec TD13.5 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Kick returns241 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume29
  • Explosiveness43
  • Consistency80
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 9 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.42 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.57 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Louisville (SP+ 14).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5701.57Wk 1 vs Georgia State: +0.30 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: +0.77 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs VMI: +1.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisville: +1.57 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Duke: +0.86 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs North Carolina: -0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Notre Dame: +0.41 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Virginia Tech: +1.35 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami: +0.58 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs NC State: +0.45 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.48 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsFlorida StateW24-21-3.22199.5012
1vsGeorgia StateW35-12-17.944310.80120.30
2@SyracuseL28-315.558617.20450.77
3vsVMIW59-7510220.41501.26
4@LouisvilleL19-3113.658817.60511.57
6vsDukeW24-145.66427.01160.86
7@North CarolinaW41-345.03196.3014-0.09
8vsNotre DameL13-3123.96599.80170.41
9@Virginia TechL6-2110.059018.00571.35
11vsMiamiW28-2321.62147.00110.58
13vsNC StateW30-293.9510621.20490.45
14@GeorgiaL42-4424.388610.81330.48

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.1%
Passing plays
16.6%
Rushing plays
4.5%
Standard downs
9.5%
Passing downs
11.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.59
Passing downs
1.09
Pass / Rush EPA
0.90 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.