Skip to content
Eric Rivers

#3Eric Rivers

Eric Rivers is a Versatile WR for Georgia Tech. Eric's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 78 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Eric Rivers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
47 Receptions671 Rec yards2 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec
Returns
9 Punt returns95 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness49
  • Consistency59
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency59th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.24 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.97 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs NC State (SP+ 5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9701.97Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.42 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Gardner-Webb: -0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Clemson: +1.91 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Temple: -0.43 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Wake Forest: +0.58 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Virginia Tech: +0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Duke: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Syracuse: +0.48 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs NC State: +1.97 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Boston College: +0.77 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Pittsburgh: -0.04 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia: +0.12 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@ColoradoW27-20-8.33248.00130.42
2vsGardner-WebbW59-1223316.5017-0.13
3vsClemsonW24-219.537224.00421.91
4vsTempleW45-24-5.111414.0014-0.43
5@Wake ForestW30-295.78779.61170.58
7vsVirginia TechW35-20-10.14297.30220.15
8@DukeW27-186.63217.00130.37
9vsSyracuseW41-16-13.15438.60140.48
10@NC StateL36-484.839732.30681.97
12@Boston CollegeW36-34-8.5711917.00480.77
13vsPittsburghL28-428.422010.0011-0.04
14vsGeorgiaL9-1624.122010.00110.12
20vsBYUL21-2515.9410225.5166

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.1%
Passing plays
18.0%
Rushing plays
1.6%
Standard downs
8.1%
Passing downs
12.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
1.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / 0.43

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.