Skip to content
Eric McAlister

#1Eric McAlister

WR·TCU·2025

Eric McAlister is a Versatile WR for TCU. Eric's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 111 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Eric McAlister's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
72 Receptions1190 Rec yards10 Rec TD16.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness64
  • Consistency73
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency73th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.40 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.69 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Kansas State (SP+ 7).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6902.69Wk 1 vs North Carolina: -0.02 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Abilene Christian: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SMU: +1.49 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Colorado: +1.55 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: +2.69 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Baylor: +0.05 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs West Virginia: +0.34 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Iowa State: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs BYU: +0.84 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Houston: +0.87 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Cincinnati: +0.90 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@North CarolinaW48-14-6.63206.7012-0.02
3vsAbilene ChristianW42-2124623.00330.47
4vsSMUW35-2413.4825431.83701.49
6vsColoradoW35-21-8.346516.32231.55
7@Kansas StateL28-417.0415639.02852.69
8vsBaylorW42-361.47628.90270.05
9@West VirginiaW23-17-6.8912413.81280.34
11vsIowa StateL17-209.9111079.70190.22
12@BYUL13-4415.9410726.80470.84
13@HoustonW17-147.447919.81370.87
14vsCincinnatiW45-234.5810112.61270.90
20vsUSCW30-2716.98698.6014

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.3%
Passing plays
23.1%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
11.9%
Passing downs
13.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
1.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.68 / 1.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.