Skip to content
Dymere Miller
Dymere Miller

Dymere Miller

WR·Rutgers·2024

Dymere Miller is a Versatile WR for Rutgers. Dymere's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 63 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dymere Miller's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
59 Receptions757 Rec yards4 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec
Returns
0 Kick returns-4 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness39
  • Consistency84
  • Pass-Down83
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.44 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 2.39 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Akron (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.390−2.39Wk 1 vs Howard: +1.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Akron: +2.39 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: +1.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington: +1.08 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nebraska: +0.07 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: +0.02 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +1.09 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs USC: +1.03 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Minnesota: +1.76 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Maryland: +1.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +1.49 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan State: +1.77 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsHowardW44-7—4379.31161.06
2vsAkronW49-17-17.947719.30312.39
4@Virginia TechW26-2310.059819.60221.48
5vsWashingtonW21-183.12157.50121.08
6@NebraskaL7-145.523517.50180.07
7vsWisconsinL7-423.04174.3060.02
8vsUCLAL32-35-1.357014.00241.09
9@USCL20-4211.91113111.90451.03
11vsMinnesotaW26-1910.455811.62201.76
12@MarylandW31-17-3.9810713.41321.25
13vsIllinoisL31-389.633812.70171.49
14@Michigan StateW41-14-4.644812.00161.77
20vsKansas StateL41-4414.122613.0016—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.1%
Passing plays
15.5%
Rushing plays
0.2%
Standard downs
6.6%
Passing downs
8.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.11
Passing downs
1.30
Pass / Rush EPA
1.21 / -1.05

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.