Skip to content
Dominick Blaylock
Dominick Blaylock

#12Dominick Blaylock

WR·Georgia Tech·2023

Dominick Blaylock is a Versatile WR for Georgia Tech.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dominick Blaylock's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
21 Receptions337 Rec yards2 Rec TD16.0 Yards/rec
Returns
8 Punt returns89 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume14
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency64
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 2.27 from the first to second half of the season.
  • ▸Peak game: 3.79 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Miami (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.790−3.79Wk 1 vs Louisville: -0.96 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Carolina State: +1.56 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Ole Miss: -0.94 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Bowling Green: +1.25 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Miami: +3.79 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Boston College: +1.40 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Virginia: +1.16 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Syracuse: +3.63 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLouisvilleL34-398.0—————-0.96
2vsSouth Carolina StateW48-13—44611.51231.56
3@Ole MissL23-4818.42178.509-0.94
5vsBowling GreenL27-38-7.8713118.70311.25
6@MiamiW23-209.613434.00343.79
8vsBoston CollegeL23-38-5.92199.50101.40
10@VirginiaW45-17-10.83227.30151.16
12vsSyracuseW31-22-4.426834.01533.63

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.9%
Passing plays
10.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
4.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.60
Passing downs
2.31
Pass / Rush EPA
1.01 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.