← Player leaders
#2Demond Williams Jr.
Demond Williams Jr. is a Dual-Threat QB for Washington. Demond's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 154 plays — a developing rate for the QB.
2024 Production
Passing
82/105 Comp/Att944 Pass yards8 Pass TD1 INT78.1% Comp %
Rushing
282 Rush yards2 Rush TD83 Carries3.4 Yards/carry
Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers
Player type
Dual-Threat QB
A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.
Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
- ▸Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
- ▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
- ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.09 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
- ▸Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Indiana (SP+ 20).
NIL Market Tier· 2024
On3 valuation ↗Star
Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.
Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.
Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Opp SP+ | C/ATT | Pass Yds | Pass TD | INT | QBR | Rush Yds | Rush TD | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | vsWeber State | W35-3 | — | 3/5 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 45.1 | 17 | 0 | 0.54 |
| 2 | vsEastern Michigan | W30-9 | -13.3 | 3/3 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 57.0 | 30 | 0 | 0.14 |
| 3 | vsWashington State | L19-24 | 1.3 | 3/4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 53.8 | 22 | 0 | 0.15 |
| 4 | vsNorthwestern | W24-5 | -8.2 | 2/2 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 64.8 | 9 | 0 | 0.47 |
| 5 | @Rutgers | L18-21 | 6.4 | 1/1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 58.6 | 12 | 0 | -0.23 |
| 6 | vsMichigan | W27-17 | 10.6 | 2/2 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 97.6 | 20 | 0 | 0.47 |
| 7 | @Iowa | L16-40 | 15.8 | 12/16 | 71 | 1 | 0 | 99.2 | 23 | 0 | 0.38 |
| 9 | @Indiana | L17-31 | 20.1 | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 96.6 | 15 | 1 | 0.66 |
| 10 | vsUSC | W26-21 | 11.9 | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | — | — | -0.65 |
| 11 | @Penn State | L6-35 | 24.6 | 6/10 | 60 | 0 | 0 | 80.9 | 38 | 0 | -0.07 |
| 12 | vsUCLA | W31-19 | -1.3 | 7/8 | 67 | 1 | 0 | 89.9 | 31 | 0 | 0.41 |
| 14 | @Oregon | L21-49 | 26.0 | 17/20 | 201 | 1 | 0 | 74.3 | 17 | 0 | 0.23 |
| 1 | vsLouisville | L34-35 | 13.6 | 26/32 | 374 | 4 | 1 | 85.2 | 48 | 1 | 0.42 |
Usage & Situational · Pro
Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.8%
Passing plays
28.3%
Rushing plays
16.5%
Standard downs
19.9%
Passing downs
30.8%
EPA by down type
- Standard downs
- 0.32
- Passing downs
- 0.37
- Pass / Rush EPA
- 0.34 / 0.33
Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).