Dan Buschman Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Eastern Michigan

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.55 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 3.20 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Western Michigan (SP+ 12).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
2	@Missouri	L21-61	-1.0	1	30	30.0	0	30	0.86
3	@Charlotte	W37-19	-20.9	3	40	13.3	0	32	0.45
7	@Ohio	W27-20	-2.1	1	17	17.0	0	17	1.36
8	@Western Michigan	L31-45	11.5	1	16	16.0	0	16	3.20
11	@Ball State	W48-41	-7.0	2	31	15.5	2	30	2.36
12	vsNorthern Illinois	L24-31	-2.4	1	25	25.0	0	25	1.71
13	vsCentral Michigan	W26-21	-6.1	1	7	7.0	0	7	0.27

Snap-share proxy

Overall

2.6%

Passing plays

4.8%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

2.3%

Passing downs

3.3%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs Central MichiganWk 13

EPA 0.3

Rec 1 · Rec Yds 7 · Avg 7.0 · Rec TD 0