Skip to content
Cornelius Johnson
Cornelius Johnson

#6Cornelius Johnson

Cornelius Johnson is a Versatile WR for Michigan. Cornelius's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 56 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cornelius Johnson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
47 Receptions604 Rec yards1 Rec TD12.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume20
  • Explosiveness39
  • Consistency87
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 12 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 2.00 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Bowling Green (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.0002.00Wk 1 vs East Carolina: +0.70 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UNLV: +0.99 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Bowling Green: +2.00 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Nebraska: +0.80 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Minnesota: +1.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Indiana: +0.77 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Michigan State: +0.56 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Purdue: +1.76 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Penn State: +0.98 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Maryland: +0.69 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ohio State: +0.91 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Iowa: +0.57 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsEast CarolinaW30-3-12.857114.20200.70
2vsUNLVW35-71.458216.40260.99
3vsBowling GreenW31-6-7.837123.71502.00
5@NebraskaW45-70.323216.00200.80
6@MinnesotaW52-100.438628.70491.14
7vsIndianaW52-7-7.411515.00150.77
8@Michigan StateW49-0-6.83268.70110.56
10vsPurdueW41-13-7.323919.50231.76
11@Penn StateW24-1523.522412.00130.98
12@MarylandW31-2411.03248.00100.69
13vsOhio StateW30-2425.24338.30190.91
14vsIowaW26-05.89647.10140.57
20vsWashingtonW34-1316.43258.3010
20vsAlabamaW27-2023.12126.0012

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.9%
Passing plays
15.9%
Rushing plays
0.6%
Standard downs
7.7%
Passing downs
4.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.63
Passing downs
1.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.76 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.