Skip to content
Chris Tyree

#4Chris Tyree

WR·Notre Dame·2022202120200.0 pts line value1st Round

Chris Tyree is a 3-year Versatile WR for Notre Dame. Chris's 2022 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 124 plays — a developing rate for the WR. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chris Tyree's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2020

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.9680
National rank
#70
High school
Thomas Dale
Hometown
Chester, VA

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Rushing
444 Rush yards3 Rush TD100 Carries4.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions138 Rec yards2 Rec TD5.8 Yards/rec
Returns
15 Kick returns254 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume41
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency26
  • Pass-Down62
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.11 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Marshall (SP+ 3).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.1500.024.2
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Ohio State: -0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: +0.79 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs California: +0.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs North Carolina: +0.17 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs BYU: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Stanford: -0.36 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UNLV: +0.38 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Syracuse: +0.09 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Clemson: +0.21 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Navy: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Boston College: -0.21 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs USC: +0.78 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs South Carolina: -0.12 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Ohio StateL10-2131.1166.006-0.01
2vsMarshallL21-263.02147.0090.79
3vsCaliforniaW24-17-3.05448.81210.02
4@North CarolinaW45-327.84246.00130.17
6vsBYUW28-20-1.42-2-1.004-0.23
7vsStanfordL14-16-7.2-0.36
8vsUNLVW44-21-11.90.38
9@SyracuseW41-242.511010.00100.09
10vsClemsonW35-1417.622613.00140.21
11vsNavyW35-32-7.2155.0150.29
12vsBoston CollegeW44-0-14.9210.502-0.21
13@USCL27-3818.90.78
1vsSouth CarolinaW45-3812.74102.509-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.4%
Passing plays
6.7%
Rushing plays
19.8%
Standard downs
15.4%
Passing downs
11.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.610−1.1520212022
EPA per play · 2020 — 2022 · 36 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2020Notre Dame
0.6
23.6
2021Notre Dame
0.0
9.7
2022Notre Dame
0.0
11.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.