Skip to content
Chris Jimerson Jr.
Chris Jimerson Jr.

#12Chris Jimerson Jr.

Chris Jimerson Jr. is a Volume Passer for North Texas.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chris Jimerson Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
1/2 Comp/Att37 Pass yards1 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
37 Rush yards0 Rush TD6 Carries6.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume8
  • Dual-Threat20
  • Consistency56
  • Clutch40
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 4.94 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs UTSA (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.9404.94Wk 7 vs South Florida: -0.34 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UTSA: +4.94 EPA/play8Wk 13 vs Rice: +1.16 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Temple: -0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
7vsSouth FloridaL36-6311.60/10000.630-0.34
8vsUTSAW55-173.71/13710100.04.94
13@RiceW56-24-14.82501.16
14vsTempleW52-25-5.190-0.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.9%
Passing plays
1.5%
Rushing plays
4.2%
Standard downs
3.0%
Passing downs
2.6%

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.