Skip to content
Chase Curtis

#81Chase Curtis

TE·TCU·2025

Chase Curtis is a Slot Specialist TE for TCU.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Chase Curtis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
13 Receptions167 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume7
  • Explosiveness39
  • Consistency79
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 1.27 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.91 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Abilene Christian.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.9102.91Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +1.76 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Abilene Christian: +2.91 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Arizona State: +0.66 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Colorado: +2.83 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Kansas State: +1.42 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Baylor: -0.16 EPA/play8Wk 13 vs Houston: +1.04 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@North CarolinaW48-14-6.612020.00201.76
3vsAbilene ChristianW42-2111111.01112.91
5@Arizona StateL24-273.912121.00210.66
6vsColoradoW35-21-8.323819.00272.83
7@Kansas StateL28-417.04276.81151.42
8vsBaylorW42-361.4-0.16
13@HoustonW17-147.434214.00261.04
20vsUSCW30-2716.9188.008

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.6%
Passing plays
4.4%
Rushing plays
0.4%
Standard downs
1.9%
Passing downs
4.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
2.23
Pass / Rush EPA
1.39 / -0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.