Skip to content
Byron Cardwell

Byron Cardwell

Byron Cardwell is a Explosive Back for San Diego State. Byron's 2025 season produced 13.3 total EPA across 39 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Byron Cardwell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
267 Rush yards1 Rush TD48 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions108 Rec yards1 Rec TD21.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns31 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume25
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency8
  • Receiving55
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency8th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.22 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Wyoming (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2201.22Wk 1 vs Stony Brook: -0.13 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs California: -0.17 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Colorado State: +0.41 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Nevada: -0.04 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Fresno State: +0.78 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wyoming: +1.22 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Hawai'i: -0.57 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Boise State: +0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San José State: -0.14 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsStony BrookW42-07284.00-0.13
4vsCaliforniaW34-0-3.2144.00-0.17
6vsColorado StateW45-24-15.6151298.610.41
7@NevadaW44-10-13.49414.60100-0.04
9@Fresno StateW23-01.87263.7025900.78
10vsWyomingW24-7-11.3144.0024911.22
11@Hawai'iL6-381.7263.00-0.57
12vsBoise StateW17-73.13155.000.16
13vsSan José StateW25-3-14.3284.00-0.14
20vsNorth TexasL47-4913.8166.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.6%
Passing plays
2.6%
Rushing plays
12.2%
Standard downs
9.0%
Passing downs
7.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.12
Pass / Rush EPA
1.36 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.