Bryce Dixon Stats, EPA & Player Profile

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs TE peers

Player type

Red Zone Weapon TE

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)—

Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.73 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 2.65 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Oregon State (SP+ 3).

EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsFresno State	W52-13	-6.9	1	22	22.0	1	22	0.44
3	@Boston College	L31-37	4.9	1	25	25.0	0	25	0.62
5	vsOregon State	W35-10	3.2	2	44	22.0	0	31	2.65
8	vsColorado	W56-28	-5.0	2	24	12.0	2	15	0.86
13	@UCLA	L20-38	17.7	1	12	12.0	0	12	0.41
14	vsNotre Dame	W49-14	10.8	3	27	9.0	0	13	0.43
1	vsNebraska	W45-42	13.1	4	44	11.0	1	20	0.68

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.2%

Passing plays

8.3%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

4.2%

Passing downs

4.1%

EPA by down type

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Plays

Usage

vs NebraskaWk 1

EPA 0.7

Rec 4 · Rec Yds 44 · Avg 11.0 · Rec TD 1