Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Bryant Wesco Jr.

#12Bryant Wesco Jr.

Bryant Wesco Jr. is a Versatile WR for Clemson. Bryant's 2024 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 61 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

2024 Production

Receiving
41 Receptions708 Rec yards5 Rec TD17.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyPass-Down
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency67th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.89 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.64 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Virginia Tech (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2014–2024 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamYrPlaysWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh2016630.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force2021600.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State2017700.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU2024560.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic2020530.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Georgia: +0.66 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs NC State: -0.68 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Stanford: +0.57 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.70 EPA/play6Wk 10 vs Louisville: +0.53 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia Tech: +2.64 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +1.56 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs The Citadel: +1.93 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs South Carolina: +0.38 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs SMU: +1.22 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Texas: -0.28 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgiaL3-3424.3155.0050.66
2vsApp StateW66-20-8.1313043.3176
4vsNC StateW59-353.91-1-1.000-0.68
5vsStanfordW40-14-8.2210452.01700.57
6@Florida StateW29-13-3.24246.00160.70
10vsLouisvilleL21-3313.67537.60190.53
11@Virginia TechW24-1410.011717.00172.64
12@PittsburghW24-204.936120.30451.56
13vsThe CitadelW51-1437525.01551.93
14vsSouth CarolinaL14-1716.956713.40360.38
15vsSMUW34-3117.5814317.92431.22
1@TexasL24-3824.133010.0012-0.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
14.4%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.8%
Passing downs
8.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.52
Passing downs
0.83
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.