Skip to content
Bert Emanuel Jr.
Bert Emanuel Jr.

#5Bert Emanuel Jr.

QB·Central Michigan·20221.6 pts line value1st Round

Bert Emanuel Jr. is a Dual-Threat QB for Central Michigan. Bert's 2022 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bert Emanuel Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2022

3-Star · Developmental
Stars
247 composite
0.8663
National rank
#855
High school
Fort Bend Ridge Point
Hometown
Missouri City, TX

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Passing
4/8 Comp/Att54 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT50.0% Comp %
Rushing
496 Rush yards7 Rush TD67 Carries7.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume81
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency70
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.65 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Buffalo (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6500.65Wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: +0.03 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Buffalo: +0.65 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.13 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
10@Northern IllinoisW35-22-18.83000.03
11vsBuffaloW31-27-9.21/3220097.329330.65
12vsWestern MichiganL10-12-17.33/3320033.9981
13@Eastern MichiganL19-38-7.10/200064.27530.13

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.3%
Passing plays
12.9%
Rushing plays
37.0%
Standard downs
32.3%
Passing downs
18.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.06
Passing downs
1.77
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.75 / 0.59

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.710−0.03
EPA per play · 2022 · 3 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.