Scores
Dev
Go Pro
← Player leaders
Athan Kaliakmanis

#16Athan Kaliakmanis

Athan Kaliakmanis is a Dual-Threat QB for Rutgers. Athan's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 461 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

2024 Production

Passing
213/395 Comp/Att2696 Pass yards18 Pass TD7 INT53.9% Comp %
Rushing
251 Rush yards3 Rush TD92 Carries2.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

EfficiencyVolumeDual-ThreatConsistencyClutch
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.13 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.66 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Akron (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Howard: +0.36 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Akron: +0.66 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Virginia Tech: +0.10 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Washington: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nebraska: -0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wisconsin: +0.01 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.45 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs USC: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Minnesota: +0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Maryland: +0.49 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Illinois: +0.30 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Michigan State: +0.40 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Kansas State: +0.36 EPA/play1
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsHowardW44-715/241473065.44300.36
2vsAkronW49-17-17.914/232303163.70.66
4@Virginia TechW26-2310.016/252690077.61600.10
5vsWashingtonW21-183.114/241151079.8800.22
6@NebraskaL7-145.515/371861219.3-120-0.23
7vsWisconsinL7-423.012/321030136.14800.01
8vsUCLAL32-35-1.318/302870165.32310.45
9@USCL20-4211.927/473131062.1-100.15
11vsMinnesotaW26-1910.417/332403171.8-1900.19
12@MarylandW31-17-3.920/302382092.32600.49
13vsIllinoisL31-389.618/361742075.38420.30
14@Michigan StateW41-14-4.613/221571084.81700.40
1vsKansas StateL41-4414.114/322371163.31800.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.2%
Passing plays
99.8%
Rushing plays
14.7%
Standard downs
44.3%
Passing downs
74.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.