Skip to content
Ashtyn Hawkins

#6Ashtyn Hawkins

Ashtyn Hawkins is a Versatile WR for Baylor. Ashtyn's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 85 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ashtyn Hawkins's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
53 Receptions621 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume26
  • Explosiveness31
  • Consistency40
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency40th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.60 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.65 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Arizona (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.6502.65Wk 1 vs Auburn: +1.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SMU: +1.02 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Samford: -0.35 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: -1.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: +0.33 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas State: +0.20 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs TCU: +1.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Cincinnati: -0.04 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs UCF: -0.18 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Utah: +1.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +2.65 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Houston: -0.04 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsAuburnL24-3811.647017.50361.07
2@SMUW48-4513.41014514.50281.02
3vsSamfordW42-734214.0036-0.35
4vsArizona StateL24-273.91-1-1.000-1.21
5@Oklahoma StateW45-27-15.12157.5080.33
6vsKansas StateW35-347.04338.30120.20
8@TCUL36-428.379513.60411.01
9@CincinnatiL20-414.53279.0015-0.04
10vsUCFW30-3-1.28334.1015-0.18
12vsUtahL28-5522.2711917.00371.25
13@ArizonaL17-4112.0188.0082.65
14vsHoustonL24-317.433511.7023-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.2%
Passing plays
16.0%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
7.9%
Passing downs
12.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.85
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.