Skip to content
Alred Luke

Alred Luke

Alred Luke is a Versatile WR for Missouri State. Alred's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 64 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Alred Luke's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
43 Receptions640 Rec yards5 Rec TD14.9 Yards/rec
Returns
14 Kick returns257 KR yards0 KR TD12 Punt returns87 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume24
  • Explosiveness53
  • Consistency58
  • Pass-Down36
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency58th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.09 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.25 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs SMU (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2501.25Wk 1 vs USC: +0.24 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: -0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs SMU: +1.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UT Martin: +0.84 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: +0.28 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs New Mexico State: -0.62 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Liberty: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.65 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kennesaw State: +0.87 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.26 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@USCL13-7316.93258.30180.24
2@MarshallW21-20-4.522412.0023-0.35
3vsSMUL10-2813.458016.01271.25
4vsUT MartinW42-10911012.21240.84
5vsWestern KentuckyL22-271.637123.70440.28
7@Middle TennesseeW22-20-16.022512.50190.32
9@New Mexico StateW24-17-15.5144.004-0.62
10vsFlorida InternationalW28-21-10.5
11@LibertyW21-17-9.022110.50120.29
12vsUTEPW38-24-17.52147.01110.65
13@Kennesaw StateL34-41-5.457314.60280.87
14vsLouisiana TechL30-42-1.322412.00150.26
20vsArkansas StateL28-34-8.8716924.1259

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.5%
Passing plays
15.2%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
9.1%
Passing downs
7.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.55
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.52 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.