Skip to content
Aidan Armenta

#10Aidan Armenta

Aidan Armenta is a Volume Passer for UL Monroe. Aidan's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 288 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aidan Armenta's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
147/252 Comp/Att1619 Pass yards12 Pass TD8 INT58.3% Comp %
Rushing
60 Rush yards2 Rush TD60 Carries1.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
3.5y
Avg depth
6.0y
After catch
63%
Catch rate

The ball travels 3.5 yards in the air on an average throw 4.3 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.0 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
6
50% · 14y
3
67% · 18y
6
83% · 35y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat33
  • Consistency51
  • Clutch26
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency51th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.21 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs UTEP (SP+ -18).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6200.62Wk 1 vs St. Francis (PA): +0.13 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Alabama: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs UTEP: +0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arkansas State: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northwestern: +0.18 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Coastal Carolina: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Troy: +0.00 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Old Dominion: -0.14 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs South Alabama: -0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Texas State: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana: +0.26 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSt. Francis (PA)W29-012/2395119.53910.13
2@AlabamaL0-7314.88/1428013.8400.07
4@UTEPW31-25-17.58/141362078.51900.62
5vsArkansas StateW28-16-8.816/251752136.42000.38
6@NorthwesternL7-425.810/191291056.6-1900.18
7@Coastal CarolinaL8-23-15.114/281761124.020-0.07
8vsTroyL14-37-4.819/331711219.5-2200.00
10vsOld DominionL6-315.912/20150119.2-20-0.14
12vsSouth AlabamaL14-26-12.710/1982012.8-120-0.20
13@Texas StateL14-312.319/261660049.42010.42
14@LouisianaL27-30-10.119/313113061.51100.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
46.1%
Passing plays
91.3%
Rushing plays
11.7%
Standard downs
37.0%
Passing downs
61.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.12
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Aidan Armenta Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Ul Monroe · Gridpex