Skip to content
Adjatay Dabbs

#3Adjatay Dabbs

Adjatay Dabbs is a Red Zone Weapon WR for Toledo.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Adjatay Dabbs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
8 Receptions135 Rec yards3 Rec TD16.9 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
17.8y
Avg depth
11.7y
After catch
50%
Catch rate

The ball travels 17.8 yards in the air on an average target 8.8 yards deeper than the median. Another 11.7 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 60y
1
100% · 29y
1
0% · 0y
short
1
0% · 0y
1
100% · 6y
1
0% · 0y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness66
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Red Zone Weapon WR

Goes from good to great inside the 20 — high TD conversion on limited looks makes this receiver a scoring machine.

Red zone targetHigh TD rateSize/catch radius advantage
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Michigan State (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9501.95Wk 1 vs Michigan State: +1.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Connecticut: +0.91 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Michigan StateL20-301.0410125.32601.95
2vsCentral ConnecticutW63-104348.51140.91

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.8%
Passing plays
25.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
10.4%
Passing downs
14.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.36
Passing downs
2.27
Pass / Rush EPA
1.31 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.