Skip to content

T.J. Hughes vs Bo Horvat

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Bo Horvat is ahead on 11 of 13 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Bo Horvat sits in the 89th percentile, T.J. Hughes the 24th.

MeasureHughesHorvat
Scoring · NHL
Points02
Goals01
Assists01
Ice time per game16:4620:31
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1558 pct0.2882 pct
Shot attempts per game3.072 pct5.093 pct
Goals above expected−0.324 pct+0.477 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share43.6%32 pct36.5%17 pct
Chances for per 602.5556 pct2.6160 pct
Chances against per 603.3015 pct4.543 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1024 pct+0.5389 pct
Creates per 60−0.0333 pct+0.6096 pct
Prevents per 60−0.0728 pct−0.0630 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →