Skip to content

Tim Washe vs Mark Jankowski

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Tim Washe and Mark Jankowski split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Jankowski sits in the 95th percentile, Tim Washe the 8th.

MeasureWasheJankowski
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals00
Assists10
Ice time per game16:1412:36
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0315 pct0.0421 pct
Shot attempts per game1.018 pct0.711 pct
Goals above expected−0.156 pct−0.145 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share24.1%4 pct31.4%11 pct
Chances for per 600.741 pct1.7927 pct
Chances against per 602.3347 pct3.917 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.358 pct+0.7195 pct
Creates per 60−0.363 pct+0.2674 pct
Prevents per 60+0.0145 pct+0.4598 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →