Skip to content

Matthew Schaefer vs Cody Ceci

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Matthew Schaefer is ahead on 11 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Matthew Schaefer sits in the 85th percentile, Cody Ceci the 8th.

MeasureSchaeferCeci
Scoring · NHL
Points21
Goals00
Assists21
Ice time per game24:1018:31
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1353 pct0.0424 pct
Shot attempts per game5.093 pct2.046 pct
Goals above expected−0.328 pct−0.150 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.7%68 pct45.1%35 pct
Chances for per 602.4858 pct2.4155 pct
Chances against per 601.7574 pct2.9323 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.4685 pct−0.348 pct
Creates per 60+0.3382 pct−0.1616 pct
Prevents per 60+0.1374 pct−0.1813 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →