Skip to content

Ilya Protas vs Mark Jankowski

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mark Jankowski is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mark Jankowski sits in the 96th percentile, Ilya Protas the 2nd.

MeasureProtasJankowski
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals01
Assists11
Ice time per game11:0412:37
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.0420 pct0.0631 pct
Shot attempts per game0.77 pct1.015 pct
Goals above expected−0.147 pct+0.886 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share44.4%32 pct41.3%25 pct
Chances for per 602.4656 pct2.6461 pct
Chances against per 603.0818 pct3.766 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.532 pct+0.7396 pct
Creates per 60−0.392 pct+0.3180 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1419 pct+0.4398 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 555 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →