Skip to content

Konsta Helenius vs Gavin McKenna

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius is ahead on 12 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Konsta Helenius sits in the 99th percentile, Gavin McKenna the 18th.

MeasureHeleniusMcKenna
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game14:5414:32
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3084 pct0.1045 pct
Shot attempts per game3.579 pct1.327 pct
Goals above expected+0.477 pct−0.325 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share62.6%80 pct37.6%20 pct
Chances for per 602.9874 pct2.0238 pct
Chances against per 601.7871 pct3.3614 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.0099 pct−0.1718 pct
Creates per 60+0.7498 pct−0.0530 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2691 pct−0.1221 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →