Skip to content

Konsta Helenius vs Noah Laba

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is creates per 60: Konsta Helenius sits in the 99th percentile, Noah Laba the 18th.

MeasureHeleniusLaba
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals10
Assists01
Ice time per game14:1614:44
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2069 pct0.0420 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct0.66 pct
Goals above expected+0.475 pct−0.237 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share66.7%90 pct33.3%12 pct
Chances for per 602.4857 pct1.5918 pct
Chances against per 601.2493 pct3.1816 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.0099 pct−0.1025 pct
Creates per 60+0.7199 pct−0.1618 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2993 pct+0.0555 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →