Skip to content

Konsta Helenius vs Chris Tanev

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Konsta Helenius is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is creates per 60: Konsta Helenius sits in the 98th percentile, Chris Tanev the 12th.

MeasureHeleniusTanev
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game14:5418:55
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.3083 pct0.015 pct
Shot attempts per game3.580 pct0.34 pct
Goals above expected+0.476 pct0.062 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share62.6%80 pct39.1%23 pct
Chances for per 602.9873 pct1.9535 pct
Chances against per 601.7872 pct3.0421 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+1.0099 pct+0.2969 pct
Creates per 60+0.7498 pct−0.2112 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2691 pct+0.4999 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →