Skip to content

Daniil But vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Daniil But and Luca Cagnoni split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Daniil But sits in the 95th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureButCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals11
Assists01
Ice time per game11:1521:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1558 pct0.2475 pct
Shot attempts per game1.739 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected+0.681 pct+0.580 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share40.4%26 pct24.6%5 pct
Chances for per 602.3652 pct0.893 pct
Chances against per 603.4712 pct2.7431 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.7095 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60+0.4891 pct−0.334 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2287 pct−0.1220 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →