Zach Metsa vs Tanner Jeannot
Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.
2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far
Change first player
Sabres skaters
- Tage Thompson
- Jack Quinn
- Noah Ostlund
- Konsta Helenius
- Rasmus Dahlin
- Zach Benson
- Jiri Kulich
- Ryan McLeod
- Josh Norris
- Josh Doan
- Peyton Krebs
- Mattias Samuelsson
- Olen Zellweger
- Sam Carrick
- Louis Crevier
- Owen Power
- Beck Malenstyn
- Matt Grzelcyk
- Zach Metsa
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Change second player
Bruins skaters
- JJ Peterka
- David Pastrnak
- Morgan Geekie
- James Hagens
- Pavel Zacha
- Casey Mittelstadt
- Fraser Minten
- Elias Lindholm
- Tanner Jeannot
- Sean Kuraly
- Nikita Zadorov
- Marat Khusnutdinov
- Jonathan Aspirot
- Mason Lohrei
- Connor Clifton
- Hampus Lindholm
- Will Borgen
- Mark Kastelic
League chance leaders
- Leon Draisaitl
- Andrei Svechnikov
- Tomas Hertl
- Vasily Podkolzin
- Kyle Connor
- Pavel Dorofeyev
- Adrian Kempe
- Jordan Eberle
- William Eklund
- Nick Schmaltz
- Cole Perfetti
- Michael Brandsegg-Nygård
- Dylan Guenther
- Clayton Keller
- William Nylander
- Will Smith
- Alex Tuch
- Nathan MacKinnon
- Sebastian Aho
- Marco Rossi
- Kirill Kaprizov
- JJ Peterka
- Artemi Panarin
- Sam Reinhart
Another club (its chance leader)
Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better
Tanner Jeannot is ahead on 8 of 12 measures. The widest gap is chances against per 60: Tanner Jeannot sits in the 95th percentile, Zach Metsa the 23rd.
| Measure | Metsa | Jeannot |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring · NHL | ||
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| Goals | 0 | 1 |
| Assists | 1 | 0 |
| Ice time per game | 10:41 | 10:33 |
| His chances · ours | ||
| Expected goals per game | 0.001 pct | 0.0840 pct |
| Shot attempts per game | 0.01 pct | 2.046 pct |
| Goals above expected | 0.068 pct | +0.787 pct |
| With him on the ice · ours | ||
| Chance share | 54.1%57 pct | 63.1%82 pct |
| Chances for per 60 | 3.4889 pct | 1.8128 pct |
| Chances against per 60 | 2.9523 pct | 1.0595 pct |
| 5-on-5 impact · ours | ||
| Net impact per 60 | −0.0629 pct | +0.1557 pct |
| Creates per 60 | −0.1319 pct | +0.1153 pct |
| Prevents per 60 | +0.0760 pct | +0.0553 pct |
How this is measured
Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.
Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →
