Skip to content

Matthew Wood vs Zach Metsa

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Matthew Wood is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Matthew Wood sits in the 85th percentile, Zach Metsa the 1st.

MeasureWoodMetsa
Scoring · NHL
Points11
Goals00
Assists11
Ice time per game16:4710:42
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2782 pct0.001 pct
Shot attempts per game3.785 pct0.01 pct
Goals above expected−0.87 pct0.064 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share58.4%70 pct51.1%48 pct
Chances for per 603.3086 pct2.6964 pct
Chances against per 602.3547 pct2.5837 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1223 pct−0.0727 pct
Creates per 60+0.1256 pct−0.1419 pct
Prevents per 60−0.249 pct+0.0759 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →