Skip to content

Matthew Wood vs Zemgus Girgensons

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Matthew Wood and Zemgus Girgensons split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is shot attempts per game: Matthew Wood sits in the 88th percentile, Zemgus Girgensons the 10th.

MeasureWoodGirgensons
Scoring · NHL
Points01
Goals00
Assists01
Ice time per game16:4412:10
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2881 pct0.0525 pct
Shot attempts per game4.088 pct0.710 pct
Goals above expected−0.612 pct−0.141 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share57.8%66 pct53.5%55 pct
Chances for per 602.4252 pct3.2783 pct
Chances against per 601.7673 pct2.8426 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.1421 pct+0.0238 pct
Creates per 60+0.0949 pct−0.0627 pct
Prevents per 60−0.229 pct+0.0863 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →