Skip to content

Oliver Moore vs Scott Laughton

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Oliver Moore and Scott Laughton split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Scott Laughton sits in the 85th percentile, Oliver Moore the 3rd.

MeasureMooreLaughton
Scoring · NHL
Points10
Goals10
Assists00
Ice time per game11:3714:19
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1351 pct0.1968 pct
Shot attempts per game2.046 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected+0.683 pct−0.419 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share15.9%1 pct46.7%41 pct
Chances for per 600.913 pct3.2885 pct
Chances against per 604.791 pct3.748 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.2869 pct−0.0925 pct
Creates per 60+0.0646 pct−0.0333 pct
Prevents per 60+0.2287 pct−0.0632 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →