Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Emmitt Finnie

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Emmitt Finnie is ahead on 7 of 12 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Emmitt Finnie sits in the 88th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureCagnoniFinnie
Scoring · NHL
Points21
Goals11
Assists10
Ice time per game20:3316:32
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1660 pct0.3187 pct
Shot attempts per game2.766 pct1.736 pct
Goals above expected+0.578 pct+0.165 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share29.1%8 pct58.0%69 pct
Chances for per 601.135 pct2.3249 pct
Chances against per 602.7430 pct1.6878 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct+0.5188 pct
Creates per 60−0.325 pct+0.3786 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1320 pct+0.1475 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →