Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Olen Zellweger

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Luca Cagnoni is ahead on 7 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Olen Zellweger sits in the 72nd percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureCagnoniZellweger
Scoring · NHL
Points20
Goals10
Assists10
Ice time per game20:3315:31
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1660 pct0.0838 pct
Shot attempts per game2.767 pct2.047 pct
Goals above expected+0.580 pct−0.152 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share29.1%7 pct—
Chances for per 601.136 pct—
Chances against per 602.7431 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct+0.3272 pct
Creates per 60−0.324 pct+0.2168 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1320 pct+0.1067 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →