Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Mitch Marner

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Mitch Marner is ahead on 9 of 10 measures. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Mitch Marner sits in the 89th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureCagnoniMarner
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals11
Assists11
Ice time per game20:3321:53
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1660 pct0.3387 pct
Shot attempts per game2.767 pct3.784 pct
Goals above expected+0.580 pct0.068 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share29.1%7 pct67.7%88 pct
Chances for per 601.136 pct2.0137 pct
Chances against per 602.7431 pct0.9696 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct+0.5489 pct
Creates per 60−0.324 pct+0.3281 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1320 pct+0.2287 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →