Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Michael Amadio

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Michael Amadio is ahead on 10 of 12 measures. The widest gap is prevents per 60: Michael Amadio sits in the 89th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 20th.

MeasureCagnoniAmadio
Scoring · NHL
Points23
Goals12
Assists11
Ice time per game20:3317:29
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.1660 pct0.3791 pct
Shot attempts per game2.767 pct2.560 pct
Goals above expected+0.580 pct+1.396 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share29.1%7 pct61.1%74 pct
Chances for per 601.136 pct2.6361 pct
Chances against per 602.7431 pct1.6878 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct+0.2868 pct
Creates per 60−0.324 pct+0.0443 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1320 pct+0.2489 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 540 skaters who have at least 19 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →