Skip to content

Luca Cagnoni vs Claude Giroux

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Luca Cagnoni and Claude Giroux split the measures 4 each. The widest gap is net impact per 60: Claude Giroux sits in the 84th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 4th.

MeasureCagnoniGiroux
Scoring · NHL
Points22
Goals10
Assists12
Ice time per game21:1918:17
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2475 pct0.1763 pct
Shot attempts per game4.087 pct4.087 pct
Goals above expected+0.580 pct−0.237 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share24.6%5 pct—
Chances for per 600.893 pct—
Chances against per 602.7431 pct—
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60−0.454 pct+0.4584 pct
Creates per 60−0.334 pct+0.2674 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1220 pct+0.1984 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 519 skaters who have at least 18 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →