Skip to content

Stephen Halliday vs Luca Cagnoni

NHL

Who gets more chances, who finishes them, and whose team owns the ice when he is on it? The league's scoring numbers and ours, side by side.

2026-27 seasonregular season and playoffs so far

Every measurepct = league percentile, higher is better

Stephen Halliday and Luca Cagnoni split the measures 6 each. The widest gap is chances for per 60: Stephen Halliday sits in the 98th percentile, Luca Cagnoni the 5th.

MeasureHallidayCagnoni
Scoring · NHL
Points12
Goals11
Assists01
Ice time per game10:0820:33
His chances · ours
Expected goals per game0.2883 pct0.1660 pct
Shot attempts per game2.357 pct2.766 pct
Goals above expected+0.267 pct+0.578 pct
With him on the ice · ours
Chance share54.2%59 pct29.1%8 pct
Chances for per 604.4198 pct1.135 pct
Chances against per 603.727 pct2.7430 pct
5-on-5 impact · ours
Net impact per 60+0.3879 pct−0.454 pct
Creates per 60+0.5092 pct−0.325 pct
Prevents per 60−0.1222 pct−0.1320 pct
How this is measured

Points, goals, assists and ice time are the NHL's own numbers for the season. Everything else is ours, from the shot model: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, added up for the shooter (his chances) or for everyone on the ice with him at five-on-five (with him on the ice). The impact rating also accounts for his linemates, opponents, home ice and the score. The bold number is the better of the two.

Percentiles compare each skater with the 543 skaters who have at least 22 five-on-five minutes this season; a skater under that minimum has no on-ice numbers here yet. For chances against, a higher percentile means fewer allowed. Goalies are not compared on this page. More →